Madras HC Questions Restriction on Appointing Physical Education Teachers in Schools

High Court raises concern over PET appointment policy

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has sought clarity from the Tamil Nadu School Education Department regarding its policy that restricts the appointment of Physical Education Teachers (PETs) in schools with less than 250 students. Justice PT Asha, while hearing a petition challenging staff fixation orders, noted that such restrictions directly affect the holistic development of students.

The issue stems from staff allocation decisions where schools were denied permission to appoint physical education teachers, citing these posts as surplus due to low student strength. The judgment highlighted that this approach disregards the essential role of physical education in a child’s growth.

Court highlights health and lifestyle concerns among children

Justice Asha observed that today’s children are becoming increasingly sedentary, with many indulging in video games instead of outdoor activities. This shift has led to rising concerns such as child obesity, diabetes, and depression. The judge stressed that physical education is not merely recreational but also plays a critical role in enhancing both physical and mental well-being.

She stated that assigning two periods daily for physical and health education, as mandated by the syllabus, appears contradictory when schools are denied qualified instructors. Without PETs, this requirement becomes nearly impossible to fulfill, resulting in compromised student well-being.

Supreme Court precedence

The Court also noted that the Supreme Court is currently reviewing similar cases concerning the appointment of physical education instructors across India. Reports from different states, including Tamil Nadu, have already been submitted for consideration. Justice Asha urged the petitioner to produce the report submitted by Tamil Nadu to the apex court, which could shed light on the government’s stance.

Government asked to file report

Finding the restriction “surprising” and a matter of concern, the Court directed the School Education Department to file a detailed report on its current policy. The directive applies to all categories of schools—government, aided, unaided, and corporation institutions. The matter has been adjourned for further hearing on October 10.

Importance of physical education in schools

Physical education is increasingly recognized as a foundation for lifelong health and discipline. Experts argue that regular physical activity in schools helps:

• Improve concentration and classroom performance

• Reduce risks of childhood obesity and lifestyle-related disorders

• Support emotional resilience and mental health

• Instill teamwork, discipline, and leadership qualities

By restricting the presence of PETs, critics believe the government risks undermining these benefits. Advocates call for policies that ensure every school—regardless of student strength—has access to trained physical educators.

Looking ahead

The case has opened a wider dialogue about the importance of physical well-being in education policy. With concerns over screen addiction, sedentary lifestyles, and growing incidences of child depression and obesity, experts and educators are hopeful that the High Court’s intervention will lead to a more inclusive approach.

Parents, educators, and health advocates are watching closely, as the decision could have long-term implications for the way physical education is implemented across Tamil Nadu and potentially other states in India.

Disclaimer: The news published on MaduraiCity.co.in is for general information only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee completeness, reliability, or timeliness. The content is based on publicly available reports, legal proceedings, and court observations. We, MaduraiCity.co.in, are not liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on our content.